The Fee Is the Point: Notes on Saying No Without Falling Out With Anyone
Photo: empty rehearsal room single chair theatre studio natural light, via wildalaskatravel.com
It arrived at 11pm, as these things do. Lovely message, warm and genuinely enthusiastic, with the words “we can't pay, but it's a really great room and there'll be industry in”. I read it four times, typed a yes, deleted the yes, made a cup of tea, and sent a no.
Then I sat on the sofa feeling like I'd kicked a puppy. Nothing happened. Not one consequence. The person replied “totally understand, keep us in mind” and I never thought about it again until I started writing this.
That's the thing nobody tells you about saying no. The dread is enormous and the aftermath is usually silence.
Two nights, side by side
The yes I regret: a corporate creative showcase, sold to me as a networking event. I spent £38 on trains, took an afternoon off work, performed nine minutes to a room of people who were mostly at the bar, and came home with a lanyard and a tote bag. The word “exposure” was used three times in the briefing email and not once in a way that suggested anyone had a photographer.
The no that worked out: a small venue asked me to do something. I replied with my fee. They came back with a bit less than my fee plus a door split, which is a negotiation, not an insult. We did the show. It was good. They booked me again the following year, at the full rate, without me having to ask.
That's the whole argument in two anecdotes, really. One was a transaction dressed up as generosity. The other was a conversation about money between two adults who both wanted the thing to happen.
Exposure isn't a currency, and everybody involved knows it
Nobody pays a gas bill in “the room”. Nobody has ever settled a council tax demand with a tote bag. I don't think this is a controversial position, and yet it's the one that gets me the most defensive replies.
But I want to be fair here, because the debate online gets flattened into people shouting at each other, and the reality is more textured. The volunteer-run scratch night genuinely has no money. There is no secret budget line being withheld from you; there's a whip-round and somebody's mate doing the sound. That's not exploitation, that's community, and I've done plenty of it.
The problem isn't unpaid work in itself. It's the euphemism. It's a funded organisation with a marketing team using the word “opportunity” to mean “we'd like your labour for free and we'd rather not name that”. The dishonesty is the tell, not the amount.
What I ask myself before replying
Four questions, and I do actually write the answers down, because my instinct at 11pm is always to be helpful.
Who's paying whom in this chain? If tickets are being sold and nobody on stage is being paid, that's a choice someone made, and it wasn't you.
Is there a budget, or is the whole event unpaid? Those are different situations and they deserve different answers.
What am I actually getting? A fee. A recording I can use. A reference. A room full of my own audience. “A lovely evening” is not on the list.
Would I do this for free if nobody were watching? If yes, it's a favour, and I can say yes cheerfully and mean it. If no, the answer is no.
The scripts I actually use
I used to think I needed to be eloquent. I need to be brief.
- “That sounds brilliant — my rate for this is £X. Very happy to talk about a smaller version if the budget's tighter.”
- “I can't take on unpaid work at the moment, but I'd love to be considered when there's a budget.”
- “Not one for me this time, but I'll pass it to my newsletter.”
- And for the charity gala, which is its own genre: “Which charity is it for, and what proportion of the evening's income are the performers receiving?” That question has ended more conversations than any other I've asked, which tells you something.
None of these have ever cost me a relationship. Some have cost me a gig, and I've made my peace with that.
The guilt is not a moral signal
This is the bit I wish I'd understood years ago. The guilt is a stress response to breaking an unspoken rule that nobody ever actually agreed to. It is not evidence that you've done something wrong. It's evidence that you've done something unfamiliar.
The wider picture matters here too — the long-running arguments about fair pay in the arts, the funding squeezes, the guidance organisations put out about low and no-pay work that everyone nods at and then quietly ignores in February. No single person's no fixes any of that. But norms are just accumulated habits, and habits shift when enough of us start asking for the number.
What saying no has actually changed
My weeks got shorter. My work got paid. I got better at the work, because I wasn't doing four under-rehearsed things at once.
And, oddly, I got more generous. When you're not quietly resentful, a genuine favour is a pleasure rather than a tax. I now say yes to one or two free things a year deliberately, on purpose, chosen — and I say yes with my whole chest.
Where I've landed
Not an absolutist. Community is community, learning is learning, and a favour freely given is one of the nicest things in this line of work. But if money is moving and none of it is coming to the people on stage, ask for the number. Then send the email and hide from your inbox for an hour. That part never quite goes away.